FY 2012 Preliminary Data Table 16

Publication Date: January 27, 2014
Current as of:
StateTANF (% Yes)TANF (% No)Invalid/Not ReportedTotal
Alabama26%74%0%100%
Alaska11%89%0%100%
American Samoa0%100%0%100%
Arizona19%81%0%100%
Arkansas19%81%0%100%
California13%87%0%100%
Colorado27%73%0%100%
Connecticut12%88%0%100%
Delaware19%81%0%100%
District of Columbia16%84%0%100%
Florida7%91%2%100%
Georgia7%93%0%100%
Guam0%100%0%100%
Hawaii24%76%0%100%
Idaho2%98%0%100%
Illinois7%93%0%100%
Indiana13%87%0%100%
Iowa10%90%0%100%
Kansas7%93%0%100%
Kentucky2%98%0%100%
Louisiana8%87%6%100%
Maine5%95%0%100%
Maryland39%61%0%100%
Massachusetts23%77%0%100%
Michigan22%78%0%100%
Minnesota33%67%0%100%
Mississippi33%67%0%100%
Missouri13%87%0%100%
Montana14%86%0%100%
Nebraska21%79%0%100%
Nevada57%43%0%100%
New Hampshire28%65%6%100%
New Jersey21%79%0%100%
New Mexico17%83%0%100%
New York44%56%0%100%
North Carolina5%95%0%100%
North Dakota22%78%0%100%
Northern Mariana Islands0%100%0%100%
Ohio16%84%0%100%
Oklahoma9%91%0%100%
Oregon18%82%0%100%
Pennsylvania18%82%0%100%
Puerto Rico0%100%0%100%
Rhode Island15%85%0%100%
South Carolina15%0%85%100%
South Dakota8%92%0%100%
Tennessee68%32%0%100%
Texas0%89%11%100%
Utah9%91%0%100%
Vermont5%95%0%100%
Virgin Islands3%97%0%100%
Virginia34%66%0%100%
Washington18%82%0%100%
West Virginia11%89%0%100%
Wisconsin12%88%0%100%
Wyoming0%100%0%100%
National 17%81%2%100%

Data as of: 25-OCT-2013

Notes applicable to this report:   

  1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FFY 2012. 
  2. All percentages are based on "adjusted" numbers of families and children, unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only (which includes Federal Discretionary, Mandatory, and Matching Funds; TANF transfers to CCDF; and State Matching and Maintenance of Effort Funds). The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by its pooling factor, as reported on the ACF-800. This report takes this factor into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages. 
  3. All States provide an actual unadjusted count of families served each month.  For States reporting full population data, the number of child records reported each month were directly counted.  However, for States that only submit samples, the ratio of children-to-families was determined each month from the samples and then multiplied by the reported number of families to obtain an estimate of the unadjusted number of children served each month.  The unadjusted average number of families and children was obtained from the monthly numbers in the FFY, as reported on the ACF-801 summary (header) record.  
  4. A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. 
  5. At the time of publication, Utah had submitted 11 months of ACF-801 data for FFY 2012. All other States and Territories had submitted the full 12 months of data.
Types:
Topics:
Tags: