Introduction
This brief presents findings on the experiences of caseworkers working within public child welfare agencies in 2021 and 2022, using nationally representative data from the third cohort of the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW III) Child Welfare Workforce Study. Modeled after the descriptive Snapshot of the Child Welfare Workforce from 2021 to 2022: Caseworker Experiences Working in the Child Welfare System report (PDF), this brief provides a deeper exploratory analysis of the potential influences of caseworkers’ time spent working at their agency (i.e., tenure) on their experience as caseworkers.
This brief is part of a series that provides analysis of data collected from caseworkers, supervisors, and agency directors in participating child welfare agencies during the baseline wave of NSCAW III. NSCAW III Child Welfare Workforce Study data collection began in January 2021 and was completed in June 2022.
The Child Welfare Workforce Study is part of NSCAW III and was conducted by RTI International through a contract from the Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation (OPRE), Administration for Children and Families (ACF), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, in collaboration with ACF’s Children’s Bureau. The study is currently authorized by Social Security Act § 429 [42 U.S.C. 628b]. Data from the NSCAW III Child Welfare Workforce Study will be made available at the National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect (NDACAN) .
Purpose
The purpose of this brief is to explore how caseworker tenure potentially influenced the following experiences for caseworkers working in the child welfare system (CWS): threats to physical safety; work-life balance; quality of caseworker relationship with their supervisor; perceived preparedness; benefits, compensation, and recognition; and job commitment and career plans.
Key Findings and Highlights
Tenure:
More than one third (36.1%) of caseworkers reported working as a caseworker in their agency for 2 years or less, 34.1% for 3—5 years, and 29.8% for 6 years or more.
Physical Safety:
There were no significant differences among caseworkers who reported ever being threatened or assaulted during interactions with clients by caseworker agency tenure. A smaller proportion of caseworkers with 2 years or less at their agency reported ever encountering threats to their physical safety (threatened or assaulted) during interactions with clients compared to those with more seniority (49.7% for caseworkers with 2 years or less at their agency vs. 76.1% for those with 3—5 years, and 78.8% for those with 6 years or more).
Caseworkers who reported experiencing a threat or assault during client interactions were asked whether any such incidents occurred within the past year. A statistically significant difference emerged based on caseworker tenure (p < .05) for incidents that occurred in the past year. Among caseworkers with 2 years or less, 84.1% reported a threat or assault within the past year; 76.0% of caseworkers with 3—5 years, and 43.7% of caseworkers 6 years or more at their agency reported a threat or assault during client interactions in the past year.
Work-Life Balance:
Caseworkers were surveyed about the extent to which their job interferes with their family life. There were statistically significant differences for reported work-life balance by tenure (p < 0.05), with most of the caseworkers with 6 years or more of tenure indicating that their job interferes with their family life to “a great extent” or “a very great extent.” The significant differences are primarily driven by caseworkers with 3—5 years reporting having a better work-life balance than caseworkers with 6 years or more of tenure (p < 0.01).
Quality of Caseworker Relationship With Their Supervisor:
Approximately 90.0% of caseworkers with 2 years or less at their agency, 70.2% of caseworkers with 3—5 years, and 71.4% of caseworkers with 6 years or more had a “high” or “very high” total score on a relationship quality measure between caseworkers and supervisors.
Perceived Preparedness:
There was variation in caseworkers’ perceived preparedness across all aspects of their work—such as making decisions about family services and identifying dynamics and indicators of abuse—by caseworker tenure at agency, though very few caseworkers reported feeling poorly prepared to conduct any of the work activities assessed.
Benefits, Compensation, and Recognition:
Findings showed statistically significant differences in reported access to specific benefits by caseworker tenure, including childcare assistance (p < 0.05), flexible work hours or location (p < 0.001), option to join a union (p < 0.01), and current union membership (p < 0.001).
Job Commitment and Career Plans:
High levels of job commitment were reported by all caseworkers, regardless of tenure. The majority of caseworkers reported that they were “very likely” to be working at their current agency a year from now across all three levels of tenure.
Among caseworkers that were “not likely” or only “somewhat likely” to be working at their agency in a year, there were significant differences in future career plans by tenure: 63.3% of caseworkers with 3—5 years of tenure reported plans to continue a career in social work if they left their agency, in contrast with 47.8% of those with 2 years or less (p < 0.05).
Methods
The sample for the NSCAW III Child Welfare Workforce Study data collection followed a nested design that was derived from the 61 nationally representative child welfare agencies participating in NSCAW III. Directors who agreed to participate in the workforce survey identified agency supervisors. Then, participating agency supervisors identified caseworker supervisees. The study collected information from 48 agency directors, 126 supervisors, and 183 caseworkers during the baseline wave of NSCAW III from January 2021 to June 2022. The study sample is intended to be representative of public child welfare agencies that were able to participate in NSCAW III. Due to state confidentiality statues and agency refusals, the sample is representative of about 74.0% of child welfare agencies/agency directors, 77.0% of child welfare supervisors, and 82.0% of caseworkers in the United States.
Unique but complementary surveys were created for agency directors, supervisors, and caseworkers. Caseworker and supervisor surveys were collected primarily via web and telephone. Agency director surveys were completed via phone and, more rarely, in person.
This brief summarizes the results of descriptive and multivariate analyses related to caseworker experiences by tenure. Rao Scott Chi-square (Χ2) tests of independence and pairwise comparisons were conducted to explore caseworker experiences by tenure. All analyses used caseworker weights.
Citation
Bethune Scroggs, L., He, A. S., Kluckman, M., Ringeisen, H., & Dolan, M. (2024). Snapshot of the Child Welfare Workforce from 2021 to 2022: Caseworker Experiences Working in the Child Welfare System by Tenure. OPRE Report #2025-077. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health, and Human Services.
Related Publications
Bethune Scroggs, L., He, A. S., Kluckman, M., Ringeisen, H., & Dolan, M. (2025). Snapshot of the Child Welfare Workforce from 2021 to 2022: Caseworker Experiences Working in the Child Welfare System. OPRE Report #2025-040. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health, and Human Services.
Armstrong, J. M., McCarthy, M., Kluckman, M., Ringeisen, H., & Dolan, M. (2024). Snapshot of the Child Welfare Workforce from 2021 to 2022: NSCAW III Workforce Study Design, Data Collection, and Sample Characteristics. OPRE Report #2024-025. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.